URAG Working Paper #04-01
Development Moratoria (pdf)
by Geoffrey K. Turnbull,
revised June 2004, Journal of Housing Economics, forthcoming.
Keywords: Greenspace, land development holiday, development moratorium,
regulatory taking
Under a strict no-takings rule governments can regulate development timing
only after evidence of an externality arises. Regulation remains a threat
until (or if) such evidence arises, thereby hastening optimal development
plans for all land in the spatial market. On the other hand, the effect
on capital density varies systematically following demand growth conditions
at different locations. Further, vacant land that does not generate the
externality is developed more rapidly than is efficient ex post and its
capital density systematically affected. The efficiency gap is greater
both for land with a greater risk of being associated with the externality
when vacant and the longer the threatened moratorium.
Comments and questions regarding this paper may be directed to Geoffrey
Turnbull at gturnbull@gsu.edu.
|